|
|
|
| Retrospective Analysis to Clinic Effect of Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist in the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope |
| HUANG Meimei, HU Runzhao, LI Hongzhuang, et al |
| The First People's Hospital of Shunde Affiliated to Southem Medical Vniversity, Guangdong Shunde 528000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: Retrospective analysis to clinic effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB) Aprovel in the treatment of Vasovagal Syncope, and observe and evaluate the clinical curative effect with β blocker metoprolol. methods: 86 cases were diagnosed by tilt table test, and retrospective analyzed the patients respectively in treatment of Aprovel and Metoprolol. Recorded the patients baseline and the tilt test result after 3 months, further to observe the negative conversion rate and drug side effects. Results: Compared with those before treatment, patients in the two groups have been greatly improved, while the metoprolol group Hutt negative rate is slightly better than Aprovel group, the difference is statistically significant (P<0.05). In adverse reaction respect, Aprovel group was slightly better than metoprolol group, the difference is statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: ARB has a certain effect on the treatment of patients with Vasovagal Syncope. It is a kind of alternative treatment method with less adverse reactions than β blocker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Calkins H. Pharmacologic approaches to therapy for vasovagal syncope[J].Am Cardiol, 1999, 84: 20~25.
[2] 廖莹, 李雪迎,张燕舞,等.β-受体阻断剂治疗血管迷走性晕厥的Meta分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2008,40(6):603~608.
[3] Vyas A, Swaminathan PD, Zimmerman MB, et al.Are treatments for vasovagal syncope effective A meta-analysis[J].Int Cardiol, 2012,22.
[4] 夏林蔚,韩阳.厄贝沙坦治疗血管迷走性晕厥的疗效观察[J].现代实用医学,2011,23(7):799~801.
[5] 胡大一,郭成军,郭晋萍.倾斜实验诊断晕厥的规则[J].中国心脏起博与心电生理杂志,1997,11:217~220.
[6] 罗杰,李俭春,秦利萍,等.直立倾斜试验对原因不明晕厥患者诊断价值及美托洛尔疗效[J].中国循环杂志,1995,10:205~207.
[7] 李淑敏.倾斜试验及其临床意义[J].心血管病学进展,1995,16:321~325. |
| [1] |
. [J]. 河北医学, 2017, 23(5): 800-802. |
|
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 23 
