两种不同血管再通方法在急性脑动脉闭塞中的应用比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2018.11.034

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (1269 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective: To compare the application of two different ways of vascular recanalization (mechanical thrombectomy and arterial thrombolysis) in acute cerebral artery occlusion. Methods: The clinical data of 68 patients with mechanical thrombectomy in our hospital and 50 cases of arterial thrombolytic patients were retrospectively analyzed. The changes of NIHSS score before and after operation, puncture to repassage time, blood vessel repassage rate, incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, mortality and 3 months mRs after operation were compared between the two groups. Results: The time of the puncture and repassage of the patients in the mechanical thrombectomy group was significantly lower than that of the arterial thrombolytic group (P<0.05); the repassage rate of the patients in the mechanical thrombectomy group was significantly higher than that of the arterial thrombolysis group (P<0.05). The total incidence rate of intracranial hemorrhage were significantly lower than that in the arterial thrombolytic group (P<0.05); and there was no significant difference between the two groups after 3 months' mRS score and the NIHSS score (P>0.05); the good prognosis rate of the patients in the mechanical thrombectomy group was significantly better than that in the arterial thrombolysis group (P<0.05) at 3 months. Conclusion: Compared with the thrombolytic therapy, the treatment of thrombolytic therapy for the patients with acute cerebral artery occlusion has a wider time window, with a higher repassage rate, lower bleeding rate, which is beneficial to improve the prognosis of the patients, and should be advocated in clinical.

Key words： Acute cerebral arterial occlusion Mechanical thrombectomy Arterial thrombolysis

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHU Guifen
	ZHANG Hong
	LI Gaohua
	et al

Cite this article:

CHU Guifen,ZHANG Hong,LI Gaohua, et al. Comparison of Two Different Vascular Recanalization Methods in Acute Cerebral Artery Occlusion[J]. HeBei Med, 2018, 24(11): 1899-1902.

URL:

http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2018.11.034 OR http://www.hbyxzzs.cn/EN/Y2018/V24/I11/1899

[1] 路黎娟,徐梅佳,董焱,等.重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子对缺血缺氧性脑损伤新生大鼠凋亡诱导因子表达的影响[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2016,41(12):1545~1549.
[2] 孙如,张东伟.羟乙基淀粉辅助强化抗血小板治疗方案对脑动脉狭窄继发短暂性脑缺血发作患者近期疗效、经颅多普勒检查指标及复发率的影响[J].中国基层医药,2017,24(24):3715~3718.
[3] 张莉媛,多杰.OSAHS与脑卒中、认知功能之间关系的研究进展[J].国际呼吸杂志,2016,36(23):1837~1840.
[4] 潘双杰,何远宏,王楠,等.羟乙基淀粉对急性缺血性脑卒中患者肾功能的影响[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2017,52(3):353~355.
[5] Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos AH, Schellinger PD, et al. Successful reperfusion with intravenous thrombolysis preceding mechanical thrombectomy in large~vessel occlusions[J]. Stroke, 2018,49(1):232~235.
[6] 鱼海,张建军,张会平,等.150例青年缺血性脑卒中危险因素研究[J].河北医学,2016,22(1):84~87.
[7] Jolly M, Phillips J. Pulmonary Embolism: Current role of catheter treatment options and operative thrombectomy[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2018,98(2):279~292.
[8] Sudheendra D, Vedantham S. Catheter-directed therapy options for iliofemoral venous thrombosis[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2018,98(2):255~265.
[9] Starostka-Tatar A, Labuz-Roszak B, Skrzypek M, et al. Definition and treatment of stroke over the centuries[J]. Wiad Lek, 2017,70(5):982~987.
[10] Ritzenthaler T, Cho TH, Mechtouff L, et al. Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy: A potential approach for thrombectomy monitoring[J]. Stroke, 2017,48(12):3390~3392.
[11] Fu Q, Guo X, Mo D, et al. Young paradoxical stroke treated successfully with mechanical thrombectomy using solitaire and transcatheter closure of patent Foramen oval[J]. Int Heart, 2017,58(5):812~815.
[12] 董琨,李明达.支架机械取栓治疗急性大脑中动脉栓塞的临床疗效与长期预后观察[J].山东医药,2017,57(46):89~91.