|
|
|
| Comparative Study of Totally Laparoscopic and Laparoscopic Assisted Distal Gastrectomy on Lymph Node Dissection Surgical Status Inflammatory Factor and Prognosis |
| GAO Zihao, ZHANG Chenggong, DING Fan, et al |
| Huai'an First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Huai'an 223300, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To observe the effects of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) and laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) on lymph node dissection, surgical status, inflammatory factor levels, and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 102 gastric cancer patients from January 2020 to August 2024 were retrospectively selected and divided into TLDG group and LADG group with 51 cases in each group according to different surgical methods. Lymph node dissection, surgical situation, inflammatory factors, and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the total number of lymph nodes cleared and the number of positive lymph nodes between the two groups (P>0.05). The length of the main incision and length of postoperative hospital stay in TLDG group were shorter than those in LADG group, and the time for anastomosis was longer than that in LADG group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). 24h after surgery, the differences in C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) before and after surgery were smaller in TLDG group than in LADG group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The patients were followed up for 4~59 months. There were 7 and 5 deaths in TLDG group and LADG group, respectively, due to tumor related events. The cumulative survival rates were 73.00% and 78.10%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in survival curve between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: TLDG and LADG are both effective treatment methods. However, TLDG is better in terms of postoperative recovery, length of main incision, hospital stay, and inflammatory response.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Han B,Zheng R,Zeng H,et al.Cancer incidence and mortality in China,2022[J].Natl Cancer Cent,2024,4(1):47-53.
[2] 董军令,杨惠,李娜.1992-2021年中国居民胃癌发病率变化趋势分析[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2024,16(5):593-597.
[3] Lee HH,Lee CM,Lee MS,et al.Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer:an interim report:a phase Ⅲ multicenter,prospective,randomized trial (The KLASS-07 Trial)[J].Gastric Cancer,2024,24(3):257-266.
[4] Chen D,Yang F,Woraikat S,et al.Effectiveness and safety of self-pulling and latter transected roux-en-Y reconstruction in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy[J].Front Oncol,2022(12):916692.
[5] Park SH,Lee CM,Hur H,et al.Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy:the KLASS-07:a randomized controlled trial[J].Int Surg,2024,110(8):4810-4820.
[6] Huang C,Liu H,Hu Y,et al.Chinese laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery study (CLASS) group.Laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer:five-year outcomes from the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA Surg,2022,157(1):9-17.
[7] Li Q,Yan M,Li F,et al.Comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes after different reconstructions between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer:a retrospective analysis at a high-volume center[J].Cancer,2024,15(15):4893-4901.
[8] 孙江华,李东辉,刘世浩,等.全腔镜远端胃癌根治术与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术在消化道重建中的临床效果对比[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2022,21(5):497-501.
[9] 陆俊,李太原,张李,等.机器人对比腹腔镜胃癌根治术后的复发结局:一项多中心倾向性评分匹配研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2024,27(8):799-807. |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 31 
