|
|
|
| Comparison of Short-Term Efficacy and Aesthetics of Breast Tumor Plastic Breast-Conserving Surgery and Extended Resection Breast-Conserving Surgery in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer |
| ZHANG Yi, CHEN Yao, WANG Jing |
| The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi Xi'an 710061, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To compare the influence of breast tumor plastic breast-conserving surgery and extended resection breast-conserving surgery on short-term efficacy and wound aesthetics in patients with early breast cancer. Methods: The clinical data of patients with early breast cancer in the hospital were retrospectively analyzed from January 2021 to January 2024. Fourty-six effective cases were randomly selected from patients undergoing breast tumor plastic breast-conserving surgery and included in group A, and another fourty-six effective cases were randomly collected from patients with extended resection breast-conserving surgery and enrolled as group B. The surgical indicators, short-term efficacy and incidence rates of postoperative complications were compared between groups. The breast aesthetics at 6 months after surgery and levels of tumor serum markers [CA153, heat shock protein 90 A (HSP90 A), osteopontin (OPN), secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI)] and quality of life [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)] before surgery and at 6 months after surgery were recorded. Results: The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative drainage volume in group A were significantly shorter or less than those in group B, and the incision length was significantly shorter than that in group B (all P<0.05). At 6 months after surgery, there was no statistical significance in objective response rate (ORR) between groups (P>0.05). The breast aesthetic rate in group A (58.70%) was significantly higher than that in group B (36.96%) (P<0.05). The levels of serum tumor markers in the two groups were lower than those before surgery (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference between groups (P>0.05). At 6 months after surgery, the FACT-B scores were higher in both groups than before surgery, and group A had higher scores than group B (all P<0.05). The total incidence rate of complications in group A (19.57%) was lower than that in group B (39.13%) (P<0.05). Conclusion: Breast tumor plastic breast-conserving surgery and extended resection breast-conserving surgery have similar efficacy, but plastic breast-conserving surgery can more effectively improve postoperative breast aesthetics and quality of life of patients, and reduce the incidence rates of postoperative complications. It is suggested to choose the appropriate surgical method for treatment based on the actual situation and the needs of patients in clinical application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Hangcheng Xu,Binghe Xu.Breast cancer:Epidemiology,risk factors and screening[J].Chinese Journal of Cancer Research,2023,35(6):565-583.
[2] 莫淼,王泽洲,郑莹,等.2022年全球及中国乳腺癌流行病学特征分析[J].海军军医大学学报,2025,46(4):497-503.
[3] 陈晴纪楠,何珊珊,尹健.自体皮瓣在整形保乳术和局部晚期乳腺癌胸壁重建中的应用进展[J].中华整形外科杂志,2024,40(2):235-239.
[4] Breast cancer treatment guidelines (2022 edition)[J].Chinese Journal of Oncology,2023,45(10):803-833.
[5] 徐艳丽,罗瑞雪,杜文文,等.医护联合查房对乳腺癌患者负面情绪、心理弹性及生存质量的影响[J].国际精神病学杂志,2022,49(4):752-754,768.
[6] 钟家健,谢丽,高纪东.带蒂侧胸动脉穿支皮瓣在乳房肿瘤整形保乳术中的应用进展[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2023,15(2):223-229.
[7] 田平,宣小山,陈敬.CA15-3、CEA、CA125和COX-2联合检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值[J].分子诊断与治疗杂志,2022,14(6):1012-1015.
[8] 王洋,赵雪,王思思,等.超声弹性成像参数与乳腺癌OPN、VEGF-C表达关系及联合预测预后价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2024,40(7):744-748.
[9] Zhang X,Liu SS,Ma J,et al.Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) in cancer pathophysiology:Mechanisms of action and clinical implications[J].Pathol Res Pract,2023(248):154633.
[10] 屈洪波,朱芳,宋达疆,等.肿瘤整形技术在早期乳腺癌保乳术的效果及安全性分析[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2024,30(5):419-424. |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 31 
