Abstract:Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of 3D modeling-assisted surgery and traditional craniotomy in the treatment of gliomas in functional areas, and to explore whether 3D modeling-assisted surgery has advantages. Methods: A total of 110 patients with gliomas admitted to our hospital from May 2022 to May 2025 were retrospectively enrolled and evenly assigned, according to the surgical approach, to an observation group (3D-modeling–assisted surgery, n = 55) or a control group (conventional craniotomy, n = 55). The two groups were compared in terms of operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, total tumor resection rate, KPS score of two weeks after surgery, serum inflammatory factor levels before and after surgery, clinical effective rate, complications, and adverse reactions. Results: In the observation group, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were all lower than those in the control group, while the resection rate and KPS score were higher than those in the control group, with significant differences (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β and IFN-γ levels decreased from baseline in both the observation and control groups; the magnitude of change (pre- vs post-treatment) for every parameter was greater in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). Within each group, post-operative inflammatory mediator levels were significantly lower than pre-operative values (P<0.05). Baseline levels of IL-6, IL-1β and IFN-γ did not differ between the observation and control groups (P>0.05), whereas after treatment all three mediators were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). The effective-response rate was higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05), and the total incidence of adverse events was lower in the observation group (P<0.05). Conclusion: 3D modeling-assisted surgery shortens the operation time and hospital stay, reduces intraoperative blood loss, lowers the level of inflammatory factors, improves the resection rate of gliomas and the treatment efficiency of patients, and reduces the incidence of adverse reactions. It has the potential to be promoted and applied in clinical practice.
高宁茜, 师秋霞, 冶华玲, 赵洁, 范国锋. 3D建模辅助手术治疗功能区脑胶质瘤的临床疗效分析[J]. 河北医学, 2025, 31(11): 1835-1839.
GAO Ningxi, SHI Qiuxia, YE Hualing, et al. Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of 3D Modeling-Assisted Surgery in the Treatment of Gliomas in Functional Areas. HeBei Med, 2025, 31(11): 1835-1839.
[1] Weller M,Wen P Y,Chang S M,et al.Glioma[J].Nature Reviews Disease Primers,2024,10(1):33. [2] Schaff L R,Mellinghoff I K.Glioblastoma and other primary brain malignancies in adults:a review[J].JAMA,2023,329(7):574-587. [3] Yasinjan F,Xing Y,Geng H,et al.Immunotherapy:a promising approach for glioma treatment[J].Frontiers in Immunology,2023,14(1):1255611. [4] 周昱行,马迎通,加福民.基于脑影像的个性化脑部肿瘤模型重建与电场治疗参数优化[J].复旦学报(自然科学版),2025,64(3):243-254. [5] Hou X,Xu R,Chen L,et al.3D color multimodality fusion imaging as an augmented reality educational and surgical planning tool for extracerebral tumors[J].Neurosurgical Review,2023,46(1):280. [6] Zhao J,Huo H,Jiang J.Application of multimodal image fusion 3D reconstruction technology combined with 3D printing guide plate in meningioma surgery[J].World Neurosurgery,2025,196(1):123768. [7] Ohba S,Teranishi T,Matsumura K,et al.Factors involved in maintaining Karnofsky Performance Status (≥50%) in glioblastoma,IDH-wildtype patients treated with temozolomide and radiotherapy[J].Scientific Reports,2025,15(1):1750. [8] 王茂,谭博,宋鹏,等.多模态影像联合多模态监测辅助切除功能区脑胶质瘤的疗效分析[J].临床神经外科杂志,2025,22(3):284-290. [9] 武慧成,陈胜利.荧光素钠显微引导下边缘上切除术治疗脑胶质瘤的研究进展[J].中南医学科学杂志,2025,53(03):562-564. [10] Maas R R,Soukup K,Fournier N,et al.The local microenvironment drives activation of neutrophils in human brain tumors[J].Cell,2023,186(21):4546-4566. [11] 张鹏,王龙,赵家鹏,等.立体定向手术治疗脑胶质瘤患者的疗效及其对血清泛素偶联酶2C、CXC趋化因子配体10水平的影响[J].肿瘤基础与临床,2024,37(5):550-554.